• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

When considering a new lawn or landscape renovation, one of the biggest decisions homeowners face is choosing between synthetic turf and fresh grass. Both options have their advantages, but the financial impact can significantly impact your spending strategy and future expenses. At first glance, real grass often appears cheaper because the upfront material and labor costs are lower. You can typically buy sod by the square foot for around up to 75 cents, and professional installation might cost between $1.25 to $3 per square foot. This means a standard residential lawn could cost anywhere from 1,300 to 3,600 dollars to install initially.

Synthetic turf, on the other hand, has a larger upfront expenditure. The turf itself can range from 2 to 8 dollars per square foot, depending on quality, density, and features like UV resistance or cooling technology. Installation adds another 3 to 7 dollars per square foot, bringing the total cost for the same standard yard size to roughly $5,500 to $14,500. That’s a major contrast compared to sod, and it can be a barrier for many people.

However, the true comparison lies in ongoing financial burden. real grass requires regular upkeep that adds up over time. You’ll need to irrigate frequently, especially in hot zones, which can increase your utility bills significantly. Fertilizing, mowing, 熊本 人工芝 業者 pest control, and reseeding are all repeating outlays. Over a 10-year span, these costs can easily add another $2,500 to $6,000 or more depending on your region and how much care your lawn needs. In areas with irrigation limits, the cost of watering a traditional turf can become economically unsustainable.

Synthetic turf requires virtually zero care after installation. There’s no mowing, no watering, no fertilizer, and occasional tidying. You might occasionally straighten the strands for natural appearance or wash away dirt, but these tasks are simple and affordable. Many synthetic lawns are designed to last 12 to 30 years with expert setup. That means you pay more on day one but avoid most future expenditures.

Another factor to consider is resilience and function. Synthetic turf can handle high activity, dogs, and family life without showing wear the way live sod wears thin. It stays lush and vibrant all seasons regardless of season or weather. Real grass can wilt during heatwaves, get slippery after rain, and require replanting from thinning.

Some people also worry about the green concerns. While synthetic turf is made from plastic, it reduces irrigation demand and reduces the use of chemicals like pesticides and herbicides. Real grass, though naturally decomposing, drains local supplies and often depends on pesticides and fertilizers to stay healthy.

In the end, the choice between synthetic turf and natural sod isn’t just about the sticker price at installation. It’s about understanding what you’re paying for over the long-term ownership. If you plan to remain in your property long-term and want to reduce upkeep, costs, and labor, fake grass provides superior long-term benefit despite the larger starting investment. If you value authenticity and natural texture and are prepared to maintain it regularly, sod might be the right fit. Consider your lifestyle, climate, and long term goals when making your decision.