• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Medical Malpractice Litigation

Medical malpractice litigation can be complex and time-consuming. It is also costly for both the plaintiff as well as the defendant.

In order to receive compensation for negligence, the patient has to establish that the substandard medical treatment caused their injury. This requires establishing four legal elements which include professional duty, breach of that duty or breach, injury, and damages.

Discovery

One of the most important aspects of a medical malpractice case is the collection of evidence through written interrogatories as well as requests for the production of evidence. Interrogatories are questions that need to be answered under swearing by the opponent to the lawsuit and are used to establish facts to be presented in court. Requests for documents can be used to get tangible items, like medical records and test results.

In many cases, your attorney will attend the defendant's deposition, which is an audio recording of a question and answer session. This allows your lawyer to ask the physician or witnesses questions that would not be allowed at trial. It can be extremely effective in cases with expert witnesses.

The information you gather during pretrial discovery is used during trial to prove the following components of your claim:

Breach of the standard of care

Injuries caused by a breach of the standards of care

Proximate cause

Inability of a doctor to apply the level of knowledge and skills held by doctors in their field, and that caused injury or injury to the patient

Mediation

Although medical malpractice trials are often essential, they also have major negatives for both sides. For plaintiffs who are facing a lawsuit, the stress, expense and the time commitment associated with a trial can cause psychological harm on them. For defendant health professionals trials can cause humiliation and loss of respect. It can also result in negative consequences for their practice and career because monetary payments made in a pre-trial settlement are usually reported to national practitioner databanks as well as state medical licensing boards, and medical societies.

Mediation is a more cost-efficient, time-efficient, and risk-effective method of settling the medical malpractice case. Reducing the cost of a trial and avoiding potential eroding jury verdicts allows both parties to be more flexible in their settlement negotiations.

Before mediation, both parties will provide the mediator with brief information about the case (a "mediation brief"). The parties usually allow their communication to pass through their lawyer, rather than directly between themselves at this stage, as direct communications can be used against them later in court. As the mediation process progresses, it is a good idea to concentrate on the strengths of your case and be prepared to acknowledge its weaknesses as well. This will enable the mediator to make sense of any gaps and offer you reasonable offers.

Trial

The aim of reformers working on torts is to create an appropriate system for remuneration of those who are injured by physician negligence in a timely manner and without excessive cost. Many states have implemented tort-reform measures to reduce costs and prevent frivolous claims for medical malpractice.

Most physicians in the United States have malpractice insurance as a way of safeguarding themselves from allegations of professional negligence. Certain policies may be required by a medical or hospital group as a condition of privileges.

To be eligible for the financial compensation for injuries caused by negligence of a medical professional the injured patient must establish that the physician did not meet the standards of care applicable in his or her field. This concept is known as proximate cause and is an essential element of a medical malpractice lawsuit.

A lawsuit is initiated when a civil summons has been filed with the appropriate court. After this the parties must participate in a process of disclosure. This involves written interrogatories and the creation of documents such as medical records. Depositions (in which attorneys question deponents under the oath) and requests for admission are also involved.

The burden of proof in a medical malpractice case is extremely high, and the damages awarded are calculated based on the economic losses that are actual such as lost income and the expense of future medical expenses and non-economic losses like suffering and pain. It is essential to work with an experienced lawyer when you are trying to file a medical malpractice lawsuit.

Settlement

Settlements are the most common way to resolve medical malpractice law firm malpractice lawsuits. In general, the actual dollar value of a case is negotiated between the plaintiff and the defendants (often through or alongside the defendant's malpractice/professional liability insurer). The injured patient receives a check that is then paid to the plaintiff's lawyer who deposits it in an Escrow account. The lawyer deducts legal fees and costs in accordance with the representation agreement, and then provides the injured victims with compensation.

To win a medical malpractice lawsuit the plaintiff must demonstrate that a physician or other healthcare provider violated their duty of care by failing to show the required level of knowledge and competence in their field. They must also prove that the victim suffered injury directly as a result of the breach.

In the United States, there are 94 federal district court systems which are equivalent to state trial courts. Each of these courts has an ad hoc jury and judge panel that decides cases. In certain situations the case of medical negligence can be transferred to one of these federal district courts. In the United States, physicians carry medical malpractice insurance as a way to protect themselves from claims of injury that was not intended. Physicians should understand the structure and function of the legal system so that they can react in a timely manner to claims made against them.